Blackman v. Butler et al
| Eric Blackman |
| Kimberly S. Butler, Robert E Hughes, Jason N Hart, Randy S Pfister, Chad M Brad, Aberardo A Salinas, Salvador A Godinez and Leslie McCarty |
| 3:2016cv01152 |
| October 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Will |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER ADOPTING 109 Report and Recommendation. The 66 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Eric Blackman is DENIED. The 88 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/9/2019. (mlp)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to re-file the original Complaint (Doc. 1) and both supplements offered in support of Documents 7 and 8 together as the First Amended Complaint. The First Ame nded Complaint supersedes and replaces the original Complaint, rendering it void. See Flannery, 354 F.3d at 638, n. 1.The Clerk is also directed to UPDATE the last named of Defendant Chad M. Brad to Chad M. Brown in CM/ECF. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNT 1 is subject to further review against Defendants KIMBERLY BUTLER, ROBERT HUGHES, and JASON HART and is DISMISSED with prejudice against all other defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against them.IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED that COUNT 2 is subject to further review against Defendants SALVADOR GODINEZ and LESLIE McCARTY and is DISMISSED with prejudice against all other defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against them. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNT 3 is subject to further review against Defendants RANDY PFISTER, CHAD BROWN, and ABERARDO SALINAS and is DISMISSED with prejudice against all other defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted ag ainst them.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNT 4 is subject to further review against all defendants. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that COUNT 5 is DISMISSED without prejudice against all defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/22/2016. (tkm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
