Harris v. US Bank

Plaintiff: Christopher L. Harris
Defendant: US Bank
Case Number: 3:2016cv01204
Filed: November 2, 2016
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Referring Judge: Stephen C. Williams
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 19, 2017 60 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE granting 39 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by US Bank; denying 59 MOTION to Amend/Correct; and denying as moot 30 MOTION to Compel, 57 MOTION to Supplement, and 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Christopher L. Harris. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgmentaccordingly.Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 9/18/2017. (lmp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. US Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher L. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Bank
Represented By: James Michael Hearon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?