Morris v. Baldwin et al
| Barry Morris |
| John Baldwin, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Frank Lawrence, H. Hawkins, Gail Walls, Bobby Hughes and Cindy Meyer |
| 3:2017cv00456 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Reona J. Daly |
| David R. Herndon |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Default Judgment; finding as moot 40 Motion ; adopting 61 Report and Recommendations, vacating the Clerk's entry of default 35 and allowing defendants to file their answer instanter. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 8/30/2018. (klh)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting in part 1 Motion for TRO/Injunction. See Order for details. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 5/11/17. (klh)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. In the Complaint (Doc. 5), Plaintiff requests injunctive relief pursuant to Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Injunction (Doc. 1) was therefore included as a separate docket entry in CM/ECF, along with a copy of the Complaint. This Motion (Doc. 1) shall be REFERRED to a United States Magistrate Judge for prompt disposition. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 5/5/2017. (jaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
