Frayer v. Shawnee Correctional Center

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Southern District Frayer v. Shawnee Correctional Center

Frayer v. Shawnee Correctional Center

Plaintiff:	Austin Frayer
Defendant:	Shawnee Correctional Center
Case Number:	3:2017cv00881
Filed:	August 21, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Johnson
Presiding Judge:	David R. Herndon
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2017	Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order to file an amended complaint on or before October 30, 2017. (Doc. 7). The dismissal counts as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 11/6/2017. (tjk)
October 3, 2017	Filing 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 1 and, and the Complaint (Doc. 1), are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant SHAWNEE CORRECTIONAL CENTER is DISMISSED with prejudice be cause the Complaint fails to state a claim against the prison for relief. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this case. Should Plaintiff fail to file his First Amended Complaint within the allotted time, dismissal of this action will become with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2017). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 10/3/2017. (tjk)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2017

Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order to file an amended complaint on or before October 30, 2017. (Doc. 7). The dismissal counts as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 11/6/2017. (tjk)

October 3, 2017

Filing 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 1 and, and the Complaint (Doc. 1), are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant SHAWNEE CORRECTIONAL CENTER is DISMISSED with prejudice be cause the Complaint fails to state a claim against the prison for relief. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this case. Should Plaintiff fail to file his First Amended Complaint within the allotted time, dismissal of this action will become with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2017). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 10/3/2017. (tjk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frayer v. Shawnee Correctional Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Austin Frayer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Shawnee Correctional Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?