Brady v. IDOC et al
| Harley M. Brady |
| IDOC, John Baldwin, Steve Duncan, Nick Lamb, John Doe, Leslie McCorty, Wexford Medical Provider, Mrs. Cunningham, Mr. McFarland, Dr. Coe, Dr. James, Dr. Ahmed, P.A. Blanchard and Kammel |
| 3:2017cv00883 |
| August 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lawrence |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER GRANTING 156 Motion for Reconsideration. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to vacate the judgment. Out of an abundance of caution, the Clerk of Court is also DIRECTED to forward a copy of this order and the Court's summary judgment order ( Doc. 151) to Plaintiff. Plaintiff SHALL file a response as to why summary judgment should not be granted in favor of Wexford on Count 2 on or before June 21, 2022. Wexford's reply, if any, is due on or before July 12, 2022. Each party's brief shall not exceed ten pages. If Plaintiff fails to respond, summary judgment will be summarily granted for Wexford on Count 2. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 5/31/2022. (jmp2)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER: The Court GRANTS IN PART, MOOTS IN PART, and DEFERS RULING IN PART on 121 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants John Coe, Tammy Kimmel, and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. It is MOOT as to Defendant Kimmel, as she was previously dismi ssed from this case (Doc. 137). It is GRANTED as to John Coe and Wexford on Count 1. Judgment will be entered in their favor at the conclusion of the case. Count 1 and John Coe are DISMISSED with prejudice as a Defendant in this action. The Court DEF ERS RULING as to Count 2. The Court finds that based on the record as it currently stands, Wexford is entitled to summary judgment on Count 2, however, Plaintiff shall have an opportunity to respond and explain why summary judgment should not be awar ded to Wexford. His response is due within 30 days--on or before October 20, 2021. Wexford's response, if any, is then due November 19, 2021. Each party's brief shall not exceed 10 pages. No reply brief will be permitted. If Plaintiff fails to file a brief, summary judgment will be summarily granted for Wexford as to Count 2. The Court DISMISSES as MOOT 124 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Dee Dee Brookhart. She is DISMISSED without prejudice as a Defendant in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 9/20/2021. (klh2)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 48 Motion for Summary Judgment For Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed by Travis James, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Tammy Kimmel, and Dr. John Coe. Count 1 shall proceed against Tammy Kim mel, Dr. John Coe, and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Count 2 shall proceed only as to Wexford Health Sources, Inc.; Dr. John Coe and Travis James are DISMISSED without prejudice. Count 3 is DISMISSED without prejudice in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to correct Defendants' names on the docket as reflected in footnote 1. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/12/2019. (mlp)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 8, 9, 10, and 11 are SEVERED into a new case against UNKNOWN PARTY (Stateville NRC official that failed to provide Plaintiff with prescription medicatio n on March 11, 2015), TARRY WILLIAMS, JANE DOES 1-10 (Unknown Nurses at Stateville NRC), JOHN/JANE DOES 11-20 (Unknown Correctional Officers at Stateville NRC), and JANE DOE NO. 22 (Unknown Nurse at Stateville NRC). Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/19/2018. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
