Booker v. Cowan et al
| Willie J. Booker |
| Jeanette Cowan, John Doe, Sherry Benton, John Baldwin and Jacqueline Lashbrook |
| 3:2018cv00151 |
| January 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Staci M. Yandle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order to pay the filing fee for this action on or before the original deadline of March 6, 2018 (Doc. 4) or the extended deadline of April 5, 2018 (Doc. 7). This dismissal shall not count as one of Plaintiff's allotted strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 4/12/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Willie J. Booker. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $400.00 for this action within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of entry of this Order (on or before March 6, 2018). If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order in the time allotted by the Court, this case will be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and/or for failure to prosecute this action. (Action due by 3/6/2018). Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 2/6/2018. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
