Wooten v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Chelise Wooten |
| Commisioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2018cv01550 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Clifford J Proud |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne M. Garrison on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security and original mailed to Attorney Gaines. (kek) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-1550-JPG-CJP. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (kek) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested. (Gaines, Brent) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent M. Gaines on behalf of Chelise Wooten (Gaines, Brent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commisioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3655828.), filed by Chelise Wooten. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gaines, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
