Riles v. Brookman et al
| Santana Riles |
| Kent Brookman, Melissa Pappas, John Baldwin, John Doe, Lisa Goldman, J. Martin, Robert Mooney and Terra Ractley |
| 3:2018cv01630 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Michael J Reagan |
| Stephen C Williams |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by William D. Buchanan on behalf of Kent Brookman, Lisa Goldman (Buchanan, William) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Kent Brookman waiver sent on 10/11/2018, answer due 12/10/2018; Lisa Goldman waiver sent on 10/11/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 11
ORDER CORRECTING Doc. #9 , Memorandum and Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. In the first sentence on page 1 of Doc. 9, the Court mistakenly referred to Plaintiff as "Santiago Riles." Plaintiff's correct name is Santana Riles, as reflected in the case caption. The parties are advised to make note of this correction. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/15/2018. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Brookman, Goldman, Mooney, and Pappas on 10/11/2018. Waiver of Service due by 11/13/2018. (tjk) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2), the claims in COUNTS 1 and 5 are SEVERED into two new cases. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/10/2018. (tjk)
|
| Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 10.11 received, receipt number 44625010179 (kdb) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (tkm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #2 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $10.11. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid. In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Menard Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/13/2018. (jaj) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (jaj) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (see Doc. 2), but has failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the PLRA to determine whether the inmate is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), the Court must review the prisoner trust fund account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court with the attached certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at the facility and a copy of his/her trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period 2/1/2018 to 8/28/2018 no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at Menard Correctional Center. (Trust Fund Statement due on or before 10/22/2018). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/6/2018. (jaj)
|
| Filing 4 Letter to plaintiff regarding case opening. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (tkm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Santana Riles. (tkm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Santana Riles. (tkm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Santana Riles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Part 1, #2 Exhibits Part 2)(tkm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
