Williams v. Prince et al
| William Williams |
| Scott Prince, Jacqueline Lashbrook and John Baldwin |
| 3:2018cv01675 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Donald G Wilkerson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (tkm) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Ann Ditzler on behalf of Jacqueline Lashbrook, Scott Prince (Ditzler, Megan) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Jacqueline Lashbrook waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018; Scott Prince waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (tjk) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Lashbrook and Prince on 10/4/2018. Waiver of Service due by 11/5/2018. (tjk) |
| Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $26.28 received, receipt number 44625010200 (kek) |
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/2/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #2 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $21.28. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid.In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Menard Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/11/2018. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 4 Letter to plaintiff regarding case opening. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (tkm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by William Williams. (tkm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Williams. (tkm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Williams.(tkm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
