USA v. $39,320.00 in United States Currency et al
| United States and USA |
| $39,320.00 in United States Currency and 2010 Lexus ES350 |
| 3:2018cv02174 |
| December 14, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem with respect to one 2010 Lexus, ES350, Vin: JTHBK1EG5A2398650. (trb) |
| Filing 5 Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem with respect to $39,320.00 in United States Currency. (trb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by USA (Direct Notice of Civil Judicial Forfeiture) (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Staci M. Yandle and Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-2174-SMY-RJD. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (dmw2) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam E. Hanna on behalf of United States (Hanna, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture against $39,320.00 in United States Currency, 2010 Lexus ES350, filed by United States. (Attachments: #1 Unsworn Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanna, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
