Ramesh v. Waggoner
| Gannamani Ramesh |
| Stephaine Waggoner |
| 3:2019cv00730 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/19/2019. (tjk) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, for failure to comply with an Order of this Court.This dismissal shall NOT count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/19/2019. (tjk)
|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable (Doc. 3). Mail sent to Gannamani Ramesh. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gannamani Ramesh. Based upon the information contained in his prison trust fund account statement, Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $8.71 within FOURTEEN DAYS of the entry of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a blank Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP form along with a copy of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not comply with this Order in the time allotted, this case will be dismissed for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. (Action due by 8/7/2019). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/24/2019. (tjk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Gannamani Ramesh. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 19-cv-730-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. A copy of the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form is attached to this Order. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/8/2019. (jsm2)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gannamani Ramesh. (jsm2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephaine Waggoner, filed by Gannamani Ramesh.(jsm2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramesh v. Waggoner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stephaine Waggoner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gannamani Ramesh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
