S.M. v. TikTok Inc., et al
Plaintiff: L. M. and S.M.
Defendant: ByteDance Inc. and TikTok Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00498
Filed: May 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REGARDING CONSOLIDATION. As discussed in the Court's order of 6/29/2020 in A.S. v. TikTok Inc. et al., 20-cv-457 (S.D. Ill.), the Court orders this action CONSOLIDATED with Case No. 20-cv-457, and all future filings shall bear Case No. 20-cv-457. Due to the consolidation, this action shall be administratively closed. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/29/2020. (dhg)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 24, 2020 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. TikTok Inc. served on 6/19/2020, answer due 7/10/2020. (Onder, James)
June 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 6/11/2020. (nmf)
June 8, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to TikTok Inc., and original mailed to Attorney Onder. (kdw)
June 8, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to ByteDance Inc., and original mailed to Attorney Onder. (kdw)
June 5, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #4 Amended Complaint filed by S.M. Incorrect event selected. Select the event that most closely matches the document being filed. For this document, the correct event is "Complaint" under the heading "Initial Pleadings and Service/Complaints and Other Initiating Documents". Docket text has been modified to reflect the correct document. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 4, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James G. Onder on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Onder, James)
June 4, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons - TikTok, #3 Summons Summons - Bytedance Inc)(Onder, James) Modified on 6/5/2020 (kdw).
June 1, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #1 Complaint, filed by L. M.. Login used and signature do not match. Filer will re-file documents. Attorney Wichmann is not actively admitted to the Southern District of Illinois. For any future filings attorney Wichmann must complete the attorney admissions packet which can be found on the court's website at ilsd.uscourt.gov > Attorney information > Attorney admissions. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Onder does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. In addition Other: Civil Cover Sheet and submitted summonses are fillable documents. Fillable documents should be converted to non-fillable PDF before filing on CM/ECF. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 1, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: L. M.. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-498-RJD. Consent due by 6/22/2020 (kdw)
May 29, 2020 Filing 1 STRICKEN COMPLAINT against ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-4191882.), filed by L. M.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons - TikTok Inc, #3 Summons Summons - Bytedance Inc)(Onder, James) Modified on 6/1/2020 (kdw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S.M. v. TikTok Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ByteDance Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TikTok Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L. M.
Represented By: James G. Onder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.M.
Represented By: James G. Onder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?