Reynolds v. Williams
Petitioner: Michael Curtis Reynolds
Respondent: Eric Williams
Case Number: 3:2021cv00421
Filed: April 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: J Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2021 Filing 9 USCA Case Number 21-2123 for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Curtis Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Case Opening, #2 Circuit Rule 3(b) Notice)(kdw)
June 17, 2021 Filing 8 Rule 10 Letter. (kdw)
June 17, 2021 Filing 7 Transmission of Short Record to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal (kdw)
June 17, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Clerk's Judgment, #4 Order,, Terminate Motions, by Michael Curtis Reynolds. (kare)
May 28, 2021 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/28/2021. (jdh)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING Petitioner Michael Curtis Reynolds' #1 Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 WITH PREJUDICE, FINDING AS MOOT his #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, and DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to ENTER JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/28/2021. (cab).
May 7, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Curtis Reynolds. (jaj)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Your case number is 21-421-JPG. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $5.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/27/2021. (kare)
April 27, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Curtis Reynolds.(kare)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reynolds v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Curtis Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?