Helm v. East St Louis Police Department
| Latoya A. Helm |
| East St Louis Police Department |
| 3:2021cv00443 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Latoya Helm's #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and #5 DEFERRING RULING on her Motion for Recruitment of Counsel. The Court is satisfied with Helm's showing of indigency and will therefore permit her to proceed in forma pauperis. But although she claims to have called local attorney offices, she does not say who or when. And the application specifically states in bold, "Describe in detail everything you have done to try to get an attorney to take your case so the judge can determine whether you have made a reasonable effort to obtain representation and attach copies of any documents which show you have tried to find an attorney." The Court will give Helm 60 days to file a renewed motion with documentation showing that she tried to find an attorney. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/3/2021. (cab). THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (clt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Latoya A. Helm. (kek) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Latoya A. Helm. (kek) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against East St Louis Police Department, filed by Latoya A. Helm. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kek) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Latoya Helm to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Latoya Helm on 5/3/2021. Consent due by 5/24/2021 (kek) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert assigned. All future documents must bear case number 21-cv-443-JPG Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (kek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Helm v. East St Louis Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: East St Louis Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Latoya A. Helm | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
