Lueken v. Egner
Jennifer Lynn Lueken |
James Egner |
3:2021cv00759 |
June 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
David W Dugan |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Jennifer Lynn Lueken. (kek) |
Filing 12 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. Approved by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/3/2021. (dmw2) |
Filing 11 ORDER. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum & Order, Plaintiff's #2 #9 motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED and her claims against Defendant are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/3/2021. (sth) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL Jurisdictional Statement by Jennifer Lynn Lueken. (kek) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jennifer Lynn Lueken. (kek) |
Filing 8 ORDER. On or before August 19, 2021, Plaintiff shall file a supplemental jurisdictional statement containing additional facts showing this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over the claims. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 7/22/2021. (sth) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kdw) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT by Jennifer Lynn Lueken. Supplement to #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (mar) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT by Jennifer Lynn Lueken. Supplement to #1 Complaint. (mar) |
Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 6/30/21. Consent due by 7/21/2021 (amv) |
Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. All future documents must bear case number 21-759-DWD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (amv) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jennifer Lynn Lueken. (amv) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Egner, filed by Jennifer Lynn Lueken.(amv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lueken v. Egner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Egner | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jennifer Lynn Lueken | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.