Kruckeberg v. Cress Brook Ventures LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Curt A Kruckeberg and Carolyn Kruckeberg
Defendant: Cress Brook Ventures LLC and Guy M. Lang
Case Number: 3:2021cv01105
Filed: September 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: David W Dugan
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #17 Notice (Other) filed by Cress Brook Ventures LLC. Document 17 is a document that should not be filed in this Court. See Rule 26.1(b). Filing of Disclosure and Discovery. Interrogatories under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 and the answers thereto, requests for production or inspection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, and depositions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30 and 31 shall be served upon other counsel or parties but shall not be filed with the court. This includes notice of service of discovery documents. The party responsible for service of the discovery material shall retain the original and become the custodian thereof. (clt)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
November 1, 2021 Filing 17 STRICKEN. NOTICE by Cress Brook Ventures LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS (Finn, Thomas) Modified on 11/2/2021 (clt).
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER: Discovery due by 7/8/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 7/23/2022. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 10/14/2021. (dmw2)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. The Court adopts the Joint Report of the Parties as submitted. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2021 at 1:00 p.m. is CANCELLED. Should the parties seek to amend the trial date, a written motion will be required. If the parties find that a Settlement Conference would prove beneficial, they are instructed to file a joint motion requesting the same. A Status Conference is set for 2/15/2022 at 11:00 AM via Zoom video conference before Judge David W. Dugan. The Parties will receive the appropriate Zoom invitation via email from the Court. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 10/14/2021. (dmw2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 12, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #13 Motion for Order, Motion for Discovery filed by Cress Brook Ventures LLC. Document stricken as ordered by the Court. A completed form Joint Report of Parties and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order shall be submitted, not filed, to the assigned judges e-mail address for proposed documents. The subject line of the e- mail must include the case number and reference Joint Report. (clt)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 12, 2021 Filing 13 STRICKEN. MOTION for Order to, Joint MOTION for Discovery Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order by Cress Brook Ventures LLC. (Finn, Thomas) Modified on 10/12/2021 (clt).
October 12, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #11 Motion for Order, Motion for Discovery filed by Cress Brook Ventures LLC. Login used andsignature do not match. Further, When pleadings contain multiple attorney signatures, the non-filing attorney must include the language with consent with his/her signature. See Section 2.1 of the CM/ECF Users Manual. Filer will re-file documents. (clt)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 12, 2021 Filing 11 STRICKEN. Joint MOTION for Order to, Joint MOTION for Discovery Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order by Cress Brook Ventures LLC. (Finn, Thomas) Modified on 10/12/2021 (clt).
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. Scheduling Conference set for 10/19/2021 at 1:00 PM via Zoom video conference before Judge David W. Dugan. The Parties will receive the appropriate Zoom invitation via email from the Court. The Joint Report of the Parties is due on or before 10/12/2021 and shall be submitted via email to DWDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. The Parties are instructed to use the correct form for the Joint Report of the Parties which can be found within the attached Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/17/2021. (dmw2)
September 17, 2021 Filing 9 CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/3/2022 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial set for 11/14/2022 at 9:00 AM both in the East St. Louis Courthouse before Judge David W. Dugan. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/17/2021. (dmw2)
September 15, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John G. Simon on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Simon, John)
September 15, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica Blume Slater on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Slater, Erica)
September 14, 2021 Filing 6 Cress Brook Ventures' ANSWER to Complaint by Cress Brook Ventures LLC.(Finn, Thomas)
September 7, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas J. Finn on behalf of Cress Brook Ventures LLC (Finn, Thomas)
September 7, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ACTION: See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Finn does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (clt)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 7, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:21-cv-01105-DWD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (clt)
September 7, 2021 Filing 2 EXHIBIT by Cress Brook Ventures LLC. Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal . (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint)(Finn, Thomas)
September 7, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Madison County, case number 2021-l0000941 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4575469), filed by Cress Brook Ventures LLC.(Finn, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kruckeberg v. Cress Brook Ventures LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curt A Kruckeberg
Represented By: Erica Blume Slater
Represented By: John G. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Kruckeberg
Represented By: Erica Blume Slater
Represented By: John G. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cress Brook Ventures LLC
Represented By: Thomas J. Finn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guy M. Lang
Represented By: Thomas J. Finn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?