Blake v. Shah & Shah, LLC, et al.
Plaintiff: Therese Blake
Defendant: Shah & Shah, LLC., Syed Khalid M Shah and Shah & Shah, LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv00066
Filed: January 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Staci M Yandle
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2022 Filing 21 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-00066-SMY. (clt)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
March 9, 2022 Filing 20 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Lorenz, Natalie)
March 9, 2022 Filing 19 MOTION to Withdraw Appearance of Megan E. Shannon by Therese Blake. (Ceragioli, Anna)
March 8, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna M. Ceragioli on behalf of Therese Blake (Ceragioli, Anna)
March 4, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Syed Khalid M Shah and Shah & Shah, LLC to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Syed Khalid M Shah and Shah & Shah, LLC on 3/4/22. Consent due by 3/25/2022 (jlh)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Granting #15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney William Clifton Alexander on behalf of Therese Blake. (jlh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
March 3, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney William Clifton Alexander $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-4722624 by on behalf of Therese Blake. (Alexander, William)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #13 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Defendants request additional time to file their responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. Defendants' responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's complaint are now due on or before March 18, 2022. Responses due by 3/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 2/14/2022. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
February 11, 2022 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by All Defendants. (Lorenz, Natalie)
February 11, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie T. Lorenz on behalf of Syed Khalid M Shah, Shah & Shah, LLC (Lorenz, Natalie)
February 1, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Therese Blake. Syed Khalid M Shah served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (Shannon, Megan)
February 1, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Therese Blake. Shah & Shah, LLC served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (Shannon, Megan)
January 19, 2022 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Syed Khalid M Shah, Shah & Shah, LLC. Originals mailed to Attorney Ryan Stephan. (jlh) Modified on 1/19/2022 (jlh).
January 18, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Requested. (Stephan, Ryan)
January 18, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Requested. (Stephan, Ryan)
January 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan E. Shannon on behalf of Therese Blake (Shannon, Megan)
January 18, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James B. Zouras on behalf of Therese Blake (Zouras, James)
January 18, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan F. Stephan on behalf of Therese Blake (Stephan, Ryan)
January 18, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Therese Blake. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:22-cv-66-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 2/8/2022 (jlh)
January 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Syed Khalid M Shah, Shah & Shah, LLC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4680909.), filed by Therese Blake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Stephan, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blake v. Shah & Shah, LLC, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Therese Blake
Represented By: Ryan F. Stephan
Represented By: William Clifton Alexander
Represented By: Anna M. Ceragioli
Represented By: James B. Zouras
Represented By: Megan E. Shannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shah & Shah, LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Syed Khalid M Shah
Represented By: Natalie T. Lorenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shah & Shah, LLC
Represented By: Natalie T. Lorenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?