Bond v. Jackson County et al
| James W Bond |
| Jackson County, Jackson County District Attorneys Office, Judge, Officers, Judge Bloodsworth, Jackson County Sherriff's Office and Police Department |
| 3:2022cv01700 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (see Doc. #7 ), but has failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the PLRA to determine whether the inmate is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), the Court must review the prisoner trust fund account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court with the attached certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at the facility and a copy of his/her trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period 1/1/2022 to 7/28/2022 no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at Sheridan Correctional Center. (Trust Fund Statement due on or before 10/24/2022). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/7/2022. (tjk)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Judge Bloodsworth, Jackson County, Jackson County Sherriff's Office, Police Department, filed by James W Bond. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jaj) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James W Bond. (kare) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned Chief District Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by James W Bond. On July 28, 2022, Plaintiff James W. Bond filed a letter which asks if someone would take his case and sets forth claims that he wishes to pursue. It is unclear as to whether Bond intended to file a formal Complaint with the Court. Thus, Bond has until August 29, 2022 to clarify whether or not he intended to file a lawsuit. If he did intend to file a lawsuit, he is DIRECTED to file a formal Complaint. To aid Bond in submitting a formal Complaint, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Bond a Section 1983 Complaint form. Complaint due by August 29, 2022. If Bond indicates that he did not intend to file suit or if he fails to submit a formal Complaint, this case will be administratively closed and no filing fee will be collected. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/29/2022. (anp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Action due by 8/29/2022. (anp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing James W. Bond to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to James W. Bond on 7/29/2022. Consent due by 8/18/2022 (kare) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Complaint. Your case number is 22-1700-NJR. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $402.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/28/2022. (kare)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James W Bond.(kare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
