Tidwell v. Gross
Cleother Tidwell |
Eugene Gross |
3:2022cv02608 |
November 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Staci M Yandle |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Staci M. Yandle assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-2608-SMY Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (kare) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:22-cv-06166. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Southern District of Illinois the electronic record.(kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this action forthwith to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Division, for review of Plaintiff's initial pleadings and any other action deemed appropriate. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/9/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Cleother Tidwell (kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
MAILED Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Cleother Tidwell (kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 11/9/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tidwell v. Gross | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cleother Tidwell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eugene Gross | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.