O'Quinn v. Syngenta AG et al
Riley D. O'Quinn |
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Does 1 through 60 inclusive |
Randi Ellis |
3:2022pq01492 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley D. O'Quinn. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC served on 8/5/2022, answer due 8/26/2022. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley D. O'Quinn. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. served on 7/29/2022, answer due 8/19/2022. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. Original summons mailed to Attorney Keyes. (lmb) |
Filing 6 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 5 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Allen Smith, Jr on behalf of Riley D. O'Quinn (Smith, Robert) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 22-pq-1492-NJR. (jlrr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4830077.), filed by Riley D. O'Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keyes, Madison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.