Myers v. Hughes et al
Angelo Myers |
Dr Myers, Latoya Hughes, Wexford and B Blum |
3:2024cv01763 |
July 23, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 22.00 received, receipt number 10961 (clw) |
![]() |
Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Angelo Myers. (jaj) |
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (tkm) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 386, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 7/23/2024. Consent due by 8/13/2024 (jaj) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Angelo Myers. (jaj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angelo Myers. (jaj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Angelo Myers.(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.