Townsend v. Doe 5 et al
Joeseph Townsend |
Eric Young, Joshua Dubree, John Doe 5, John Doe 8, John Doe 6, C/O Johnson, Lucas S. Levanti and John Doe 7 |
3:2024cv02318 |
October 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 1.98 received, receipt number 12619 (clw) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Joeseph Townsend. (kare) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joeseph Townsend. (kare) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 386, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 10/15/2024. Consent due by 11/5/2024 (mamo) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Joeseph Townsend.(mamo) |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.