Boyer v. Gildea et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00129
Filed: April 13, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 11 U.S.C. ยง 101 Bankruptcy
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 337 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 333 MOTION for Taxation of Costs by Defendant Arlington Capital LLC; OVERRULING 335 OBJECTION to 334 Bill of Costs, 333 Motion for Taxation of Costs by Plaintiff R David Boyer. Court DIRECTS Clerk to tax the amount of $4,867.20 as requested in the Bill of Costs (ECF No. 334 ). Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/21/13. (cer)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 259 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 208 GT Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on Count III of Trustees Second Amended Complaint; DENYING 212 Defendant Arlington Capitals Motion for Summary Judgment on Count III of the Trustees Second Amended Complaint; Defendant Arlington Capitals 225 Motion to Strike and the GT Defendants 234 Motion to Strike are GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT; Plaintiffs 216 Motion for an Order Striking or Summarily Denying Defendants Motions Addressed to Count III is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 5/17/2012. (kjm)
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 258 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants Gasson, LLC and Christopher Gildea's Motion forSummary Judgment on Count I [ECF No. 202] is DENIED, and their Motion to Strike relating to Count I [ECF No. 228] is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT. Defendant Christopher Gildea's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as it Relates to Count II [ECF No. 205] is DENIED, and his Motion to Strike relating to Count II [ECF No. 231] is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/21/12. (jcp)
January 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 195 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 184 MOTION to Compel by Defendant Arlington Capital LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 1/29/09. (cer)
December 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 181 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 168 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Plaintiff R David Boyer. Clerk DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint as of the date of this Opinion and Order. Defendants ORDERED to respond to Second Amended Complaint on/bf 12/28/2008. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/8/08. (cer)
December 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 180 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 177 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery of Documents and Privilege Logs to Arlington Capital LLC pursuant to Court's Order of November 13, 2008 by Plaintiff R David Boyer. Plaintiff has an additional 14 days to produce the requested documents as well as the privilege log for any withheld documents. No further extensions will be granted to this new deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/2/08. (cer)
November 13, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 176 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 148 MOTION (First) to Compel Trustee to Produce Documents by Defendant Arlington Capital LLC. The Trustee shall, on or before 12/4/2008, produce the requested documents as well as a privilege log for any documents it withholds as privileged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/13/08. (cer)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyer v. Gildea et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?