Hoopes et al v. Gulf Stream Coach Inc et al
Plaintiff: Nathan Hoopes and Devon Hoopes
Defendant: Gulf Stream Coach Inc and General RV Center
Case Number: 1:2010cv00365
Filed: October 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 122 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 92 MOTION in Limine To Bar Plaintiffs' Purported Expert Bernie Garceau by Defendant Gulf Stream Coach Inc, as set forth in Order, and DENYING 94 MOTION in Limine To Bar Plaintiffs' Expert Tom Bailey by Defendant Gulf Stream Coach Inc. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 3/25/2016. (lhc)
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 64 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Defendant Gulf Stream Coach Inc. The Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' Ohio Lemon Law Act, Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, Indiana Lemon Law Act, state law negligence claims, and Plaintiffs' alternative prayer for relief on the basis of revocation and/or rescission of the contract. The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act claim. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 9/29/14. (cer)
July 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING approval of the proposed stipulated protective order submitted by the parties [45,Ex.B). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/17/12. (jcp)
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment to Enforce Arbitration Clause filed by General RV Center. Defendant General RV Center Inc's request to compel arbitration is DENIED. The motion is GRA NTED to the extent that dft General RV Center, Inc seeks dismissal of the claims against it as set forth in the Amended Complaint. Defendant General RV Center is DISMISSED from this lawsuit. The Claims against dft Gulf Stream Coach Inc remain pending. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 3/26/12. (jcp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoopes et al v. Gulf Stream Coach Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Hoopes
Represented By: Thomas W Connors PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devon Hoopes
Represented By: Thomas W Connors PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gulf Stream Coach Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General RV Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?