Martin v. Fort Wayne Police Department et al
| Anthony C Martin |
| Fort Wayne Police Department, Officer #15039, Unknown Officer #12026, Unknown Officer and Command #13372 |
| 1:2011cv00348 |
| October 6, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Robert L Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Designation of Evidence by Defendants; DENYING 84 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Affidavit by Defendants; DENYING 87 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 81 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Affidavit of Anthony Martin by Defendants; DENYING 95 PLAINTIFF MOTION to Objection; Preserving A Claim Of Error Rule 51 of the FRCP by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin; DENYING 102 FEDERAL Rules of Civil Proced 60(a),(b ) Mistake, Inadvertence, Newly Discovered Evidence, "Excusable Neglect", or Good Cause by Plaintiff Anthony C Martin; DENYING AS MOOT 103 MOTION to Continue the Pre-Trial Deadlines and the Pre-Trial Conference by Defendants. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/2013 is VACATED and the Jury Trial set for 2/12/2013 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 1/25/13. (cer)
|
|
Filing
97
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 86 MOTION DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE ANTHONY MARTIN'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS AND ANTHONY MARTIN'S THIRD REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY TO DEFENDANTS by Defendants Command #13372, Fort Wayne City of, Fort Wayne Police Department, Tom Henry, Officer #15039, Unknown Officer, Unknown Officer #12026, Rusty York. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/17/12. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 78 MOTION for Reconsideration (deemed by Court to be Motion to Compel) filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/21/2012. (lns)
|
|
Filing
76
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 75 MOTION for Reconsideration re 74 Opinion and Order filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/19/2012. (lns)
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 73 MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/24/2012. (lns)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 56 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff's Deposition Testimony filed by Defendants. Plaintiff to appear on 8/3/2012 at 8:30 AM as outlined for deposition testimony. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants' Depositions 59 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/20/2012. (cc: Pla) (lns)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING without prejudice 50 MOTION for Discovery (Motion to Compel) filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/28/2012. (lns)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING without prejudice 48 Request for Status Hearing or Emergency Joint Conference (deemed by Court to be motion to preserve evidence or a motion to compel). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/16/2012. (lns)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 12 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Anthony C Martin. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 11/15/2011. (lns)
|
|
Filing
4
OPINION AND ORDER advising Pla that his state court complaint will be STRICKEN unless he files a signed amended complaint on/bf 11/1/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 10/7/2011. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
