Mast et al v. Parrish et al
||Monte Edwin Mueller and Levi D Mast
||John M Parrish, J Scott Vanderbeck and John Doe 1-100
||November 19, 2012
||US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
||Fort Wayne Office
||Roger B Cosbey
||James T Moody
|Nature of Suit:
||Truth in Lending
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 30, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (AMENDED COMPLAINT) filed by John M Parrish, GRANTING 25 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by J Scott Vanderbeck. This action is DISMISSED as to al l John Doe defendants. Terminating as moot: 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Insufficient Process or Service of Process filed by J Scott Vanderbeck, 21 Motion to Withdraw 11 Application for Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Levi D Mast, Monte Edwin Mueller, 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by John M Parrish. All dismissals are without prejudice. Clerk to enter final judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 4/30/2013. (lns)
|January 28, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER directing Plas to file an Amended Complaint that complies with the requirements of Rule 8(a) by 2/14/2013. Failure to file an Amended Complaint as outlined may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Clerk directed to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to each Pla at their last known address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 1/28/2013. (cc: Plas)(lns)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?