Armalin v. Grant County Jail et al
| Alexander Armalin |
| Grant County Jail |
| 1:2016cv00412 |
| December 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Grant |
| Susan L Collins |
| Robert L Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER: Pla's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Dfts. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 11/13/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party via certified mail #7000 0600 0028 2819 7200)(lns)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. A copy of this Opinion and Order shall be mailed to the Plaintiff at the last address provided. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Court if the mailing is returned to the Court. The Plain tiff is further ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by filing with the Court within 30 (thirty) days a current address and a statement as to why his case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 7/22/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER re 18 Pro Se Complaint, GRANTS Alexander Armalin leave to proceed against Officer J. Pearson, Officer Miller, Officer Moore Officer Francis and Officer Loth in their individual capacities for compensatory damages on the Fourtee nth Amendment claim for failing to protect him against an attack by two inmates at the Grant County Jail on the evening of October 15, 2015; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Reggie Nevels, Cpl. Martin, Cpl. Shugart, C. Lee, J. Johnson, and Tracy Law; DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Officer J. Pearson, Officer Miller, Officer Moore Officer Francis, and Officer Loth at the Grant County Jail with a copy of this order and the amended compla int; ORDERS Officer J. Pearson, Officer Miller, Officer Moore, Officer Francis, and Officer Loth to respond only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/30/2018. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lpw)
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION AND ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Complaint form and send it to Pla; GRANTING Pla until 7/10/2017, to file an Amended Complaint, and CAUTIONING Pla that if he does not respond by that ddl, this case will be dismissed w/o further notice as outlined. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 6/20/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form)(lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armalin v. Grant County Jail et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Armalin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Grant County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
