Rogers v. Office of the Attorney General The et al
Office of the Attorney General The, Jennifer Pruitt, Kelly Pautler and Craig Bobay |
Dexter Rogers |
1:2016cv00429 |
December 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Fort Wayne Office |
Allen |
Susan L Collins |
Rudy Lozano |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, terming as moot 41 Motion to Vacate, terming as moot 42 Motion to Disqualify Judge and denying 43 Motion for Hearing. The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff until 7/28/17 to file a second amended complaint that cures the defects identified as to the Office of the Attorney General. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 7/5/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal) |
Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 Motion to Disqualify Attorney Generals Officefrom Representing the Defendants Stemming from Conflict of Interest. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/17/17. (cc: Dexter Rogers). (nal) |
Filing 19 ORDER OF RECUSAL: Clerk DIRECTED to randomly reassign this case to a Magistrate Judge within the District for the purpose of conducting all non-dispositive pretrial proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 1/25/17. (cer) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.