Stewart v. Jackson et al
| Tyquan Stewart |
| Jackson, Employee and Allen County Jail |
| 1:2017cv00273 |
| June 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Allen |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 148 MOTION in Limine Other Lawsuits and Lay Medical Testimony by Defendants Allen County Sheriff's Department, Dr Dennis, Officer Jackson, Chaplain Seivers, as outlined in Order. This case will be set for a telephonic status conference by separate entry. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 4/28/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 108 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Rene Jennings, T McCullough. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants McCullough and Jennings and against Plaintiff Stewart bey. Plai ntiff's claims against the remaining Defendants are unaffected by this order and remain pending. Plaintiff's motion for stay 115 is DENIED AS MOOT in part and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT in part. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 12/20/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (lhc) Modified on 12/20/2019 cert 7000 0600 0028 2819 7231 (lhc).
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER denying 70 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 12/21/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER: Court hereby DENIES the relief requested in the "Reconsideration for Counsel" DE 52 and REAFFIRMS its 1/3/18 and 4/24/18 rulings that, given the level of difficulty of the case and despite his mental illness, Plainti ff is competent to represent himself in this case. The Court DENIES the request to have the Court in this case decide whether counsel should be appointed for Plaintiff in the other cases, as the considerations for appointment of counsel may be unique to each case. Plaintiff must file a motion for appointment of counsel in each case, if he so wishes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/21/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 22 MOTION for Request for Removal of Judge filed by Tyquan Stewart. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 4/23/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lns)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING re Letter DE 6 , Letter DE 12 and 20 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is free to continue to attempt to retain counsel on his own. In addition, no certificate of service was filed with any of Plaintiffs filin gs. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d) requires that a certificate of service must be filed along with all papers filed with the court after the complaint, with the exception of certain discovery-related documents. Any future filings that do not contain a certificate of service may be stricken without further warning. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 01/03/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sct)
|
|
Filing
3
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING Complaint against Dfts Allen County Jail and Employee; GRANTING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tyquan Stewart; WAIVING the filing fee; and DIRECTING the USMS to effect service of process on Dft. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/13/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party and USM)(lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
