Trieglaff v. French
McLean Trieglaff |
Christian French |
1:2019cv00368 |
August 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Susan L Collins |
William C Lee |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Christian French. (Barr, Matthew) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Christian French. (Barr, Matthew) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 MOTION to Set Aside Default and for Leave to Respond to Complaint filed by Christian French. (Orlowski, Alexander) |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #9 MOTION to Set Aside Default and for Leave to Respond to Complaint of Kevin Eskowitz filed by Christian French. (Orlowski, Alexander) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Set Aside Default and for Leave to Respond to Complaint by Defendant Christian French. (Orlowski, Alexander) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander P Orlowski on behalf of Christian French (Orlowski, Alexander) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B Barr on behalf of Christian French (Barr, Matthew) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT against *Christian French* regarding #5 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default filed by McLean Trieglaff. (nal) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to Christian French by Plaintiff McLean Trieglaff. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Default)(Bradley, John) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by McLean Trieglaff. Christian French served on 9/7/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Bradley, John) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS REISSUED as to Christian French. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (rmf) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Christian French. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (rmf) |
Judge William C Lee added. (rmf) |
Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. (rmf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3986109.), filed by McLean Trieglaff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Bradley, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trieglaff v. French | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Christian French | |
Represented By: | Matthew B Barr |
Represented By: | Alexander P Orlowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: McLean Trieglaff | |
Represented By: | John F Bradley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.