Richardson v. Total Recovery Services Inc
| Joy M Richardson and Joy M Martin |
| Total Recovery Services Inc |
| 1:2020cv00250 |
| July 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure re #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action. (cer) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Joy M Richardson (McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Total Recovery Services Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (lhc) |
| Judge Holly A Brady and Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins added. *NEW CASE* (lhc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David S Klain on behalf of Joy M Richardson (Klain, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Geoffrey B McCarrell on behalf of Joy M Richardson (McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Total Recovery Services Inc( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4271059.), filed by Joy M Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Credit Report, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(McCarrell, Geoffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
