Winchester v. Gladieux et al
Plaintiff: Rodney K Winchester
Defendant: David Gladieux, Karen Richards and Any un-named/unknown policy maker
Case Number: 1:2021cv00474
Filed: December 22, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Holly A Brady
Referring Judge: Susan L Collins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING the plaintiff, Rodney K. Winchester, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $48.48 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTING the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 2/15/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Allen County Jail)(asd)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Rodney K Winchester. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(lhc)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. GRANTING Rodney K. Winchester until February 28, 2022, to respond to this order as directed. CAUTIONING Rodney K. Winchester that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 2/7/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(asd)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Rodney K Winchester. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lhc)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court DIRECTS the clerk to re-send Rodney K. Winchester an AO 239 (Rev. 1/15) (INND Rev. 8/16) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form; GRANTS Rodney K. Winchester until February 25, 2022, to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the aforementioned form along with a complete copy of his inmate trust find ledger detailing his transactions for the past six months; and CAUTIONS Rodney K. Winchester that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 2/1/22. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(ksp)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter from Rodney Winchester requesting to notify him of receipt of case previously sent (Duplicate Copy of Complaint/IFP received) (Returned file stamped copy of complaint with case number and copy of docket sheet to Mr. Winchester) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (mrm) Modified on 1/27/2022 to update (mrm).
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court DIRECTS the clerk to send Rodney K. Winchester an AO 239 (Rev. 1/15) (INND Rev. 8/16) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form, GRANTS Rodney K. Winchester until 2/7/22 to respond to this Order as directed above and CAUTIONS Rodney K. Winchester that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 1/4/22. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines per #3 Rodney K. Winchester's response due by 2/7/22. (nal)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Rodney K Winchester. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(lhc)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Any un-named/unknown policy maker, David Gladieux, Karen Richards, filed by Rodney K Winchester. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lhc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winchester v. Gladieux et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney K Winchester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Gladieux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Any un-named/unknown policy maker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?