Emerick v. Niespodziany et al
| William Gale Emerick |
| Jeffrey Niespodziany and South Bend Clinic |
| 1:2023cv00032 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case and open a new casewith these filings in the South Bend Division. *New Case #3:23-cv-55. Presiding Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr.* Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 1/25/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
| Filing 6 BRIEF in Support of #4 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by William Gale Emerick. (ash) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT of Facts regarding #4 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by William Gale Emerick. (ash) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Summary Judgement by Plaintiff William Gale Emerick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(ash) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT titled Sworn Testimony in the Form of Affidavit Facts by William Gale Emerick. (ash) |
| Filing 2 (unsigned) NOTICE of General Appearance by William Gale Emerick. (ash) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Niespodziany, South Bend Clinic (Filing fee $ 402.00.) Receipt # FTW227, filed by William Gale Emerick. (Attachments: #1 Index Cover Page, #2 Exhibit)(ash) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
