Nammari et al v. Winfield Town of et al
||Suheil Nammari and Intercon Engineering Corporation
||Winfield Town of, Winfield City of Town Council of, Winfield Town of Building Commissioner, Winfield Town of Building Inspector, DLZ Indiana LLC, William Teach, Marvin Pinkowski and Anthony Kenning
||September 7, 2007
||US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
||Andrew P Rodovich
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 29, 2010
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 97 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by DLZ Indiana LLC, Anthony Kenning. Thecourt GRANTS IN PART as it relates to Interrogatory Nos. 8, 12, and 24 and Request for Production No. 10, and DENIES IN PART as it relates to Interrogatory Nos. 2, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, and 25. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 3/29/10. (jcp)
|May 13, 2009
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 79 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 ClaimsArising Before 9/7/05 For Failure to State a Claim; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 84 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. To the extent the moti on seeks judgment on the pleadings with regard to Plaintiffs state law claims against William Teach, in his individual capacity, the motion is DENIED. In all other respects, however, the motion is GRANTED; GRANTING Marvin Pinkowskis 86 Motion to Join; GRANTING Plaintiffs 90 Motion to Strike and Withdraw. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 5/13/09. (mc)
|October 29, 2008
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendants' 53 and 55 Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint for the reasons set forth in this order. Accordingly, Counts 1, 3 and 4 of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 10/29/08. (mc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?