Trzeciak v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Plaintiff: Joseph Trzeciak
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Case Number: 2:2010cv00358
Filed: September 14, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 191 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby DENIES the Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order 186 and Renew Motion for a New Trial F.R.C.P. 59 187 . Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/5/2015. (cc: Trzeciak and Petrich) (rmn) Modified on 10/6/2015 to reflect Opinion and Order (rmn).
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 182 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 181 MOTION for Leave to File Motions for Trial Denovo and to Reconsider by Plaintiff Joseph Trzeciak, Sr. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/6/2015. (lhc)(cc: Pla and Dft)
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 175 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING the relief sought by Plaintiff Joseph Trzeciak, Sr. in the Third Amended Complaint and ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/17/15. (CC: Petrich, Trzeciak) (emr)
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 171 OPINION AND ORDER granting but for relief different than requested 168 Motion. Court ORDERS the law library to make copies of Plaintiffs evidence for the instant case. The Court hereby GRANTS the motion contained in the letter DE 167 and DIR ECTS the Clerk of Court to mail this order, DE 167 , and DE 168 to Defendant George M. Petrich. Court extends its earlier Order requiring both parties to provide copies of their proposed exhibits to the Court to on or before July 2, 2015, and REAFFIRMS the bench trial setting of 7/14/2015, at 9:30 a.m., at which Plaintiff will appear via video conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 6/25/15. cc: Trzeciak, Petrich with copies of documents listed in order (mc)
June 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 166 OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 163 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Clarifications and Objections, and DENIES IN PART the relief requested in the 164 Motion for Clarifications and Objections and the 165 Leave to File Motion How Evidenc e Should be Submitted to the Court and that Defendant have no Right to Receive Either sides Evidence before 7/14/2015, Trial by Video, except insofar as Plaintiff requests the explanation provided in the order. Court REAFFIRMS its earlier Order requiring both parties to provide copies of their proposed exhibits to the Court by 6/30/2015, and the bench trial setting of 7/14/2015, at 9:30 a.m.. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 6/19/2015. cc: Pro se pltf, pro se dft (tc)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 149 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING the Motion for Sanctions DE [128-1], DENYING as moot 146 Motion for Leave to File; GRANTING in part 147 Amended Motion for Sanctions. The Court ORDERS that Defendant Petrich pay to the Court a fine of $100 for his failure to comply with the Courts orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/29/14. cc: Trzeciak, Petrich (mc)
April 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 OPINION AND ORDER denying 87 MOTION for Order on Plaintiff to File a Reply filed by George M Petrich. The Court ORDERS Defendant Petrich to FILE a certificate of service for (1) the instant motion and (2) his Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [D E 88], upon receipt of this Order. The Court advises Defendant that the future failure to provide a certificate of service showing service on Plaintiff may result in the filing being stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 4/12/13. cc: pltf & Petrich(kjp)
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 34 3rd MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by Joseph Trzeciak, Sr, DENYING 24 MOTION to Strike 21 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, and GRANTING 14 MOTION for Su mmary Judgment filed by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. Dft George M Petrich added per 3rd Amended Complaint. Dft State Farm Fire & Casualty Company is DISMISSED. This case proceeds only against George M Petrich. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 8/15/11. cc: pltf (kjp)
March 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER denying 23 Motion to Amend Complaint with leave to refile the allegations of fraud against George C. Petrich within 45 days of the date of this Order and denying 25 Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/1/11. cc:pltf (kjp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trzeciak v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Trzeciak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Represented By: Jan N Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?