Stuhlmacher et al v. Home Depot USA Inc The et al
Plaintiff: Kurt Stuhlmacher and Kelly Stuhlmacher
Defendant: Home Depot USA Inc The and Tricam Industries Inc
Case Number: 2:2010cv00467
Filed: November 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Jasper
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 118 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 115 MOTION for Settlement Enforcement by Plaintiff Kelly Stuhlmacher. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 12/29/16. (cer)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 Motion for Leave to Take a 30(b)(6) Deposition or to Seek Leave for Trial Deposition of Dennis Simpson ; denying 59 Motion to Strike Defendants Reply to Plaintiffs Brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 3/4/14. (mc)
June 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION AND ORDER denying 41 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/21/13. (mc)
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Witness Report and Bar Testimony. Dispositive motions to be filed by 12/21/2012,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/19/12. (mc)
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss. The Stuhlmachers claim for punitive damages is DISMISSED and the Stuhlmachers are GRANTED 30 days from entrance of this order to amend their complaint. The motion is DENIED as to the rest of the complaint. The court does not find that the award of attorney fees is appropriate in this situation, so the Stuhlmachers request for attorney fees is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 5/11/11. (mc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stuhlmacher et al v. Home Depot USA Inc The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kurt Stuhlmacher
Represented By: James L Clement, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Stuhlmacher
Represented By: James L Clement, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Home Depot USA Inc The
Represented By: Eric C Papier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tricam Industries Inc
Represented By: Eric C Papier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?