Burns v. Buncich et al
| Robert L Burns |
| John Buncich, Mr Kumorek, Mrs Gore, Mac McClesky, Larry Chase, Rudolph Clay, Frances DuPey, Gerry Scheub, Mr Reeves, Mrs Leto and Lake County |
| 2:2012cv00034 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 103 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike 100 Response to Motion, 102 Supplement by Defendants Larry Chase, Mac McClesky; GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, and finding MOOT IN PART 96 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Larry Chase, Mac McClesky, as outlined in Opinion and Order. This case will be set for a scheduling conference by separate entry. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 4/11/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Larry Chase, Mac McClesky. The court will schedule further proceedings in this case by separate order. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 12/21/2015. (lhc)(cc: Pla)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 31 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Robert L Burns. Dfts shall have 21 days to file a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 4/9/2015. (lns)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
