Evans v. Salazar et al
Cherlyn Evans |
Kenneth Salazar, Constantine Dillon, Michael T Reynolds, Patricia A Rooney, US Department of the Interior and National Park Service |
2:2012cv00466 |
November 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Porter |
Andrew P Rodovich |
Robert L Miller |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the government; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 42 Rule 56 Motion to Strike the declaration of Michael Bremer; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 43 Rule 56 Motion to Strike the declaration of Elizabeth McConnell; DENYING 44 Rule 56 Motion to Strike the Vaughn index; DENYING 45 Rule 56 Motion to Strike the declaration of Patricia Rooney; DENYING 66 Rule 56 Motion to Strike the declaration of Dana Jacobsen. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 9/28/15. (mlc) |
Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 46 MOTION for Discovery by Pla Cheryl Evans. The court lifts the stay on the other pending motions. The government has 21 days from the date of this order to respond to the motions to strike; Ms. Evans will then have 14 days to reply. The government has 21 days from the date of this order to file its reply on its summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/20/2015. (lhc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.