Hearn v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Randall A. Hearn |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2016cv00312 |
| July 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 25 MOTION for Attorney Fees UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the total amount of $10,018.83 in fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justic e Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. If the Government determines that Plaintiff does not owe a pre-existing debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff and her counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/23/18. (ksp)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS the relief sought in Plaintiff's Opening Brief 16 , REVERSES the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's request to award benefits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/14/2017. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
