Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Wesolek
Plaintiff: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant: Bryan J Wesolek
Case Number: 2:2016cv00443
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Porter
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 24 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Slurry Systems Inc, Dana Wesolek. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 2/1/2018. (lhc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Wesolek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Represented By: Brandon G Hummel
Represented By: Cornelius F Riordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan J Wesolek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?