Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company v. United Rail Service, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Defendant: United Rail Service, Inc. and United Transportation Group, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2017cv00287
Filed: July 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit: Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause of Action: 49:10101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS in part Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 20 and ORDERS that Defendant's first, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth, and tenth affirmative defenses are STRICKEN. The second, sixt h, and seventh affirmative defenses remain. The Court DENIES without prejudice the Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend Defendants' Affirmative Defenses 24 with leave to refile a Motion that complies with Local Rule 15-1, on or before 5/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 5/1/2018. (jss)
April 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 21 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company. The Motion is GRANTED as to the Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to R ule 12(e) and United Rail is ORDERED to file an amended counterclaim within 14 days from the date of this Order that adequately pleads sufficient factual matter to state claims that are plausible on their face, provides notice to Indiana Harbor of it s claims, and satisfies Rule 10(b) by setting forth each claim in a separate count. The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling at a later time as to the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and the Motion to Strike pursuant to Rule 12(f). Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 4/17/18. (ksp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company v. United Rail Service, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Represented By: Edward A DeVries
Represented By: Mary Louise Kandyba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Rail Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Transportation Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?