Cross v. Gary City of et al
Princess Cross |
Gary City of, Sgt Eller, Commander Headd, Sgt Taylor, Sgt Prince and Officer Hudson |
2:2017cv00389 |
October 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Lake |
Rudy Lozano |
Andrew P Rodovich |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 48 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Against Co-Defendant the City of Gary. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant the City of Gary are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/18/19. (mlc) |
Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER The Motion for Entry of Judgment 42 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The Court ORDERS that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew Rodovich for purposes of conducting proceedings, including a damages hearing if necessary, and s ubmitting proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of the Plaintiff's 42 Motion for Entry of Judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and N.D. Ind. L.R. 72-1(b). Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/3/19. (kjp) |
Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER: The Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss filed by City of Gary, 44 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff and Defendant City of Gary are ORDERED to make their next filing in this matter on or before 12/16/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/2/2019. (lhc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.