Tutlewski et al v. Palleson et al
| William Tutlewski and Sharon Tutlewski |
| Erik Palleson and Larry Powell |
| 2:2018cv00194 |
| May 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| John E Martin |
| James T Moody |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 44 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint Naming Sharon Tutlewski Independent Administrator of the Estate of William Tutlewski filed by Sharon Tutlewski and ORDERING that the time for Plaintiffs to fi le a motion to substitute is extended to 7/14/2021. Because the issue of substitution may not be resolved, the Court VACATES the Settlement Conference currently set for 7/7/2021, and SETS this matter for a Telephonic Status Conference for 7/7/2021, at 9:30 a.m. (Central Time) to reschedule the settlement conference. The parties are instructed to dial 877-873-8017 and enter access code 5155509# when prompted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 6/30/2021. (mrm)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; GRANTS plaintiff until 1/18/19 to move for leave to file an amended complaint. If no such motion is filed by that deadline, this casewill be dismissed without further notice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 12/19/18. (mlc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
