Andrews v. HSD Holding Co. et al
| Tammy Andrews |
| Holland Special Delivery, Inc., Juan Brooks, Holland Subsidiary No. 1, Inc., Juan O Brooks and HSD Holding Co. |
| 2:2018cv00477 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| John E Martin |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER/RESET HEARING: On the Court's own motion, the Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference on 3/14/2019 is ORDERED RESET to 3/21/2019 10:45 AM Central in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan now due 3/15/2019. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 2/11/2019. (smb)
|
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand served on Juan O. Brooks on November 16, 2018, filed by Tammy Andrews. (Williams, Candace) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand served on Holland Subsidiary No. 1, Inc. d/b/a Holland Special Delivery, Inc. on November 19, 2018, filed by Tammy Andrews. (Williams, Candace) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand served on HSD Holding Co. d/b/a Holland Special Delivery, Inc. on January 28, 2019, filed by Tammy Andrews. (Williams, Candace) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to HSD Holding Co. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (ksp) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Summons filed by Tammy Andrews. (Tolbert, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E Tolbert on behalf of Tammy Andrews (Tolbert, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Candace C Williams on behalf of Tammy Andrews (Williams, Candace) |
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties (Standard Track).. (smb) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/14/2019 10:15 AM Central in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 3/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/25/2019. (smb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/28/2018. (smb)
|
| Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (rmc) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Holland Special Delivery, Inc.. (Terwilliger, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T Terwilliger on behalf of All Defendants (Terwilliger, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3765059.) from Lake Circuit Court, Cause No. 45C01-1811-CT-000770, filed by Juan Brooks, Holland Special Delivery, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Terwilliger, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
