Lynch v. DeMotte State Bank et al
Kathy Lynch |
DeMotte State Bank and Chicago Title Company, LLC |
2:2019cv00162 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Theresa L Springmann |
Real Property: Other |
12 U.S.C. ยง 2605 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 BRIEF in Support of #16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by DeMotte State Bank. (Mosby, Whitney) |
Filing 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant DeMotte State Bank. (Mosby, Whitney) |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Chicago Title Company, LLC. Chicago Title Company, LLC answer due 7/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 6/27/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(kjp) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply / Motion for Additional Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Chicago Title Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Theising, David) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Whitney L Mosby on behalf of DeMotte State Bank (Mosby, Whitney) |
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #11 Initial Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and ORDERS that Defendant Chicago Title Company, LLC has an extension until 06/27/2019 within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 06/06/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jat) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Pro Se Complaint / Initial Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Chicago Title Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Theising, David) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chicago Title Company, LLC. (Theising, David) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David J Theising on behalf of Chicago Title Company, LLC (Theising, David) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint and ORDERS that Defendant Demotte State Bank has an extension until 06/27/2019 within which to respond Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 05/30/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jat) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Briefing Schedule by Defendant DeMotte State Bank. (Pendexter, Andrew) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Pro Se Complaint by Defendant DeMotte State Bank. (Pendexter, Andrew) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DeMotte State Bank. (Pendexter, Andrew) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Miller Pendexter on behalf of DeMotte State Bank (Pendexter, Andrew) |
Filing 3 Emergency Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction for Expedited Consideration, or for a Temporary Restraining Order (unsigned) by Plaintiff Kathy Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Statement of Facts (unsigned), #3 Exhibits, #4 Proposed Order) (jat) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Chicago Title Company, LLC, DeMotte State Bank. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (rmf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 2 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms and with Jury Demand against Chicago Title Company, LLC, DeMotte State Bank (Filing fee $ 400.) Receipt #2018262, filed by Kathy Lynch. (rmf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.