Thompson Read v. Saharah, Inc. et al
A. Dominique Thompson Read and Naomi |
Saharah, Inc., Seif El Sharif and Saharah, Inc. doing business as Fantasy |
2:2020cv00233 |
June 18, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Theresa L Springmann |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 206 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MOTION to Stay DISCOVERY PENDING THE COURTS RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendants Seif El Sharif, Saharah, Inc.. (Daugherty, James) |
Filing 17 APPENDIX to #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 56 AND MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b) APPENDIX OF DEFENDANTS EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/MOTION TO DISMISS by Seif El Sharif, Saharah, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 through 12)(Daugherty, James) |
Filing 16 BRIEF in Support of #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 56 AND MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b) filed by Seif El Sharif, Saharah, Inc.. (Daugherty, James) |
Filing 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc) |
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 56 AND MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b) by Defendants Seif El Sharif, Saharah, Inc.. (Daugherty, James) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by James E Daugherty on behalf of Seif El Sharif (Daugherty, James) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Saharah, Inc.. (Daugherty, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James E Daugherty on behalf of Saharah, Inc. (Daugherty, James) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by James E Daugherty on behalf of Seif El Sharif (Daugherty, James) ***FILING ERROR; ATTORNEY REFILED AT #12 *** Modified on 8/7/2020 (ace). |
![]() |
Filing 7 Application for Attorney Jarrett L. Ellzey to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff A. Dominique Thompson Read. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number 0755-4288409 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Pro Hac Vice Temporary login, ) |
![]() |
Reset Deadlines: Answer due 8/11/2020. (shk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants Seif El Sharif, Saharah, Inc.. (Buls, David) Modified on 7/15/2020 (shk). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David A Buls on behalf of Seif El Sharif, Saharah, Inc. (Buls, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Seif El Sharif. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (shk) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Saharah, Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (shk) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (shk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4256276.), filed by A. Dominique Thompson Read. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Saharah, Inc. Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons El Sarif Proposed Summons)(Custy, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.