Foster v. Kuber Hospitality, Inc.
| Leland Foster |
| Kuber Hospitality, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00223 |
| July 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| John E Martin |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Kuber Hospitality, Inc..(Logsdon, Todd) |
Filing 8
ORDER STRIKING #4 Answer to Complaint filed by Kuber Hospitality, Inc. with leave to refile. This answer does not comply with Local Rule 10-1 insofar as it does not restate verbatim the paragraphs of the claims before responding to each of them. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/19/2021. (smb)
|
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/23/2021 09:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 9/17/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/17/2021. (smb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/17/2021. (smb)
|
| Filing 4 (Stricken 8/19/2021) ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Kuber Hospitality, Inc..(Logsdon, Todd) Modified on 8/19/2021 to show stricken (smb). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leland Foster. Kuber Hospitality, Inc. served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Dunn, Owen) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Kuber Hospitality, Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (rmf) |
| Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (rmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kuber Hospitality, Inc.( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4627946.), filed by Leland Foster. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Dunn, Owen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foster v. Kuber Hospitality, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leland Foster | |
| Represented By: | Owen B Dunn, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kuber Hospitality, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Todd B Logsdon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
