ANCO Steel Company, Inc. v. Intermetal Rebar, LLC. et al
| INTERMETAL REBAR, LLC and Intermetal Rebar, LLC. |
| ANCO STEEL COMPANY, INC. |
| JRC OPCO, LLC |
| Louis Paula |
| 2:2021cv00285 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant Intermetal Rebar, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative for Summary Judgment #6 , granting the motion to dismiss Count I. The Court ORDERS that Count I against Defendant Intermetal Rebar, LLC is DISMISSED. The case remains pending against Defendant JRC Opco, LLC. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/28/2021. (mrm)
|
|
Filing 22
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 12/2/2021 11:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Parties' proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 11/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/15/2021. (smb)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/15/2021. (smb)
|
|
Filing 19
RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ANCO Steel Company, Inc.. (Molho PHV, Ross)
|
|
Filing 18
ANSWER to #5 Answer to Complaint,, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Louis Paula.(Molho PHV, Ross)
|
|
Filing 17
ANSWER to #5 Answer to Complaint,, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, by ANCO Steel Company, Inc..(Molho PHV, Ross)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/8/2021. (smb)
|
|
Filing 15
Summons Issued as to Louis Paula. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (kms)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Tina M Paries on behalf of JRC OpCo, LLC (Paries, Tina)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Justin L Weisberg on behalf of JRC OpCo, LLC (Weisberg, Justin)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Ross I Molho PHV on behalf of Louis Paula (Molho PHV, Ross)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Justin L Weisberg on behalf of Intermetal Rebar, LLC. (Weisberg, Justin)
|
|
Filing 10
Proposed Summons filed by Intermetal Rebar, LLC.. (Paries, Tina)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455, the undersigned now recuses himself from this case. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to randomly re-assign this matter to another Magistrate Judge in the Hammond Division. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge John E Martin for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/30/2021. (bas)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Tina M Paries on behalf of Intermetal Rebar, LLC. (Paries, Tina)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Ross I Molho PHV for ANCO Steel Company, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/23/2021. (ace)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Intermetal Rebar, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and B)(Blaskovich, David)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Louis Paula, COUNTERCLAIM against ANCO Steel Company, Inc. by JRC OpCo, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Blaskovich, David)
|
|
Filing 4
Application for Attorney Ross Ivan Molho to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of ANCO Steel Company, Inc.. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number 0755-4694584(Pro Hac Vice Temporary login, )
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/17/2021. (tc)
|
|
Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. *NEW CASE* (mrm)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4686751.) from Lake Circuit Court, Cause No. 45c01-2106-ev-000721, filed by JRC OPCO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Blaskovich, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
