Gudeman v. Bucciarelli
Robert Gudeman |
Anthony Bucciarelli |
2:2021cv00332 |
October 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Theresa L Springmann |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STATEMENT Jurisdictional. (Jansen, Paul) |
Filing 11 ORDER: The court ORDERS Defendant to belatedly FILE, on or before 11/29/2021, the required jurisdictional statement. Failure to do so will result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/17/2021. (lhc) |
Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
Filing 9 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/13/2022 01:00 PM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 1/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/16/2021. (smb) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/16/2021. (smb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J Bolde on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Bolde, Michael) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Anthony Bucciarelli.(Jansen, Paul) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to FILE, on or before 11/2/2021, a supplemental jurisdictional statement regarding the citizenship of the parties as outlined. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/26/2021. (lhc) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (jdb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin G Stevenson on behalf of Anthony Bucciarelli (Stevenson, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul A Jansen on behalf of Anthony Bucciarelli (Jansen, Paul) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4723924.) from Porter Superior Court 5, Cause No. 64D05-2109-CT-008248, filed by Anthony Bucciarelli. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Jansen, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gudeman v. Bucciarelli | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Gudeman | |
Represented By: | Michael J Bolde |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Anthony Bucciarelli | |
Represented By: | Benjamin G Stevenson |
Represented By: | Paul A Jansen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.