Kopack v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
Natalie Kopack |
Landline Transportation, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger and Landline Trans LLC |
2:2022cv00313 |
October 26, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Philip P Simon |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. Magistrate Judge John E Martin and Judge Theresa L Springmann no longer assigned to case due to case Consolidation. (sej) |
Filing 6 STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED. State Court Case No. 45D01-2210-CT-000986. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(jdb) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (mlc) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Landline Transportation, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger.(Vetne, J) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Landline Transportation, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger of filing motion to consolidate (Vetne, J) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by J Thomas Vetne on behalf of All Defendants (Vetne, J) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5061104.) from Lake Superior Court, Cause No. 45D01-2210-CT-000986, filed by Tamas Rosenberger, Landline Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Vetne, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.